VOlUME 05 ISSUE 07 JULY 2022
Ghizlan ElAlaoui
Laboratory: Discourse, Creativity and Society. University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah, Fes.
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
With the rising rate of Internet penetration in Morocco, e-newspapers, which have become a popular tool in the spread of news, have given voice to their audience to have their say in what is reported. Yet, despite the popularity of such digital platforms, little is known about their interactive communication process. It is also undeniable that, from a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) perspective, it is very important to study the process of news discourse as it is a site in which ideology and unequal power relations reside. Accordingly, this study critically investigates readers’ comments in the most popular Moroccan e-newspaper, Hespress, in the way they represent the issue of irregular migration in the country. The methodological framework is a triangulation of qualitative and quantitative research methods which are used to analyse the thematic choices used in Hespress readers’ comments to represent the issue of irregular migration. The overall findings of this investigation show that Hespress’ readers represent the issue of irregular migrants as a threat to the Moroccan society. Accordingly, the scenario of ‘Us’ versus ‘Them’ is emphasised in Hespress readers’ comments. Furthermore, the finding that the readers’ comments talk negatively about the issue explains that e-newspapers have empowered their audience by giving them space to produce knowledge that can challenge the news producers.
KEYWORDS:Critical Discourse Analysis, E-Newspapers, Readers’ Comments, Irregular Migration, Morocco
REFERENCES
1) Alexa. (2018). Keyword Research, Competitor Analysis, and Website Ranking. Retrieved April 6, 2019 from:
https://www.alexa.com
2) Alexa. (2019). How Popular is Hespress.com? Retrieved October 7, 2020 from:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/hespress.com
3) Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. London: Viking.
4) Bilgili, Ö., & Weyel, S. (2009). Migration in Morocco: History, current trends and future prospects. Paper Series: Migration and development country profiles.
5) Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6) Boyd, M. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and the editorial 2.0: News reception and user generated comments in discourse about (im)migration. Language and Discourse in Social Media: New Challenges, New Approaches, 10, 1-22.
7) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
8) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London, UK: SAGE.
9) Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1997). News as social practice. Brazil: Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina.
10) Chouliaraki, L. (2010). Post-humanitarianism Humanitarian communication beyond a politics of pity. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(2), 107–126. Retrieved April 13, 2017 from:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877909356720
11) Chouliaraki, L., & Zaborowski, R. (2017). Voice and community in the 2015 refugee crisis: A content analysis of news coverage in eight European countries. International Communication Gazette, (6–7). Retrieved Juin 4, 2018 from: https://doi.org/10.1177
12) Debbarh, J. (2014b). La nouvelle politique d’Immigration et d’Asile du Royaume du Maroc (partie 2). Retrieved August 5, 2016 from:
http://www.processusderabat.net/web/uploads/SOM-
13) De Haas, H. (2005). ‘Morocco: from emigration country to Africa’s migration passage to Europe’. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved March 9, 2017 from:
www.migrationpolicy.org/article/morocco-emigration-country-
14) El Ghazouani, D. (2019). ‘A growing destination for sub-Saharan Africans, Morocco wrestles with immigrant integration’. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from:
www.migrationpolicy.org/article
15) El Kadoussi, A. (2016). The Moroccan independent press: Issues of independence and political opposition. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research.
16) Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
17) Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18) Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
19) Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
20) Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2015). A tale of two stories from ‘below the line’ comment fields at the guardian. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 317–338.
21) Habermas, J. (1991). The public sphere. In Rethinking Popular Culture, edited by C a. Mukerji and M. Scudson, 338-340. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22) Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (ed.) New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
23) Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
24) Hermida, A., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., Reich, Z., & Vujnovic, M. (2011). The active recipient: Participatory journalism through the lens of the Dewey Lippmann debate. Paper presented to International Symposium on Online Journalism 2011, University of Texas, Austin.
25) Holloway, I. & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research 3, 345/572839
26) Holst, S., & Bingöl, M. (2016). The strangers that live among us. DiVA: Department of Media and Journalism.
27) Horsti, K. (2016). Visibility without voice: Media witnessing irregular migrants in BBC online news journalism’, African Journalism Studies, 37(1), pp. 1–20.
28) Ibahrine, M. (2020). The emergence of a news website ecosystem: An exploratory study of Hespress. Journalism Practice. 14(8), 971–90.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1679037
29) Ibrahim, M. (2005). The securitization of migration: A racial discourse. International Migration, 43(5), 163-187.
30) Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
31) KhosraviNik, M. (2009). The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers during the Balkan Conflict (1999) and the British Genera. Election (2005). Discourse and Society, 20 (4), pp. 477-498.
32) KhosraviNik, M. ( 2017b). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, ed. J. Flowerdew, and J. Richardson, 582–598. London: Routledge.
33) Lahlou, M. (2003). Le Maghreb: Lieux De Transits, La pensée de midi, 2003/2.
34) Lamzouwaq, S. (2019). Moroccan digital media: More clicks, less respect. Morocco World News. Retrieved December 20, 2020 from:
https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2019/03/268763/moroccan-digital-media
35) Madianou, M. (2009). Audience reception and news in everyday life. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch. The handbook of journalism studies, 325-337. New York: Routlege.
36) Manosevitch, E., & Walker, D. (2009). Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation’, article presented on The International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX: April 17–18, 2009.
37) Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
38) O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project. Online News Association, (2003). Digital journalism credibility study. Online News Association.org. Retrieved October 14, 2003 from:
http://www.journalists.org
39) Pickering, M., (2001). Stereotyping: The politics of representation. Basingstoke; London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40) Potter, J. (2012). Discourse analaysis. In L. M. Given, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 218-220). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
41) Reah, D. (2002). The Language of Newspapers (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.
42) Reich, Z. (2011). User comments: The transformation of participatory space. Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
43) Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital prosumer. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10, pp. 13-36.
44) Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
45) Said, E. (2003). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the orient. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
46) Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
47) Thurman, N. (2008). Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user-generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media and Society 10(1), 139–157
48) UN DESA. - United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2019). International migrant stock: by destination and origin, Table 1’. New York: UN DESA. Retrieved April 24, 2020 from:
www.un.org/en/development/desa/
49) Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58.
50) Watson, J., & Hill, A. (2012). Dictionary of Media and Communication Studies. (8th Edition). Bloomsbury Academic.
51) Weninger, C. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis. In L. M. Given, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 146-148). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
52) Williams, K. (2003). Understanding media theory. Arnold: Oxford University Press.